Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS of Drosophila melanogaster from Genome Analyzer IIx, 23.8M reads. Grade B (81/100) with low evidence strength (0.61) due to extrapolated coverage (25.9x, scored 81); measured Q30 of 82.4% (scored 62/100) is moderate and the primary measured bottleneck. Borderline depth and quality limit assembly confidence; coverage verification needed.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0