← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
38/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Montevideo str. OH_2009072675
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
266004374
reported
total reads
497026
reported
n content pct
0.021
measured
pct q20 bases
66
measured
pct q30 bases
66
measured
gc content pct
52.6
measured
mean read length
403.6
measured
mean base quality
20.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
19.94
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 38/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
66
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
19.94
measured
×0.5
63%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
33 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0