Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted amplicon sequencing of the sugarcane hybrid CP88-1762 on Illumina MiSeq generated 65,402 reads spanning 18.6 million bases with exceptional quality (99.1% Q20, 96.5% Q30, zero N content), indicating highly specific genomic region amplification. This dataset is suited for validating specific loci, targeted variant detection, or population-level SNP genotyping in sugarcane. Search terms: amplicon MiSeq, targeted sequencing, cultivar genomics, GC-rich amplicons (61.4%).
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0