Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS of Bos mutus from HiSeq 2000, 53.6M reads, 10.7B bases. Grade B (88/100, all measured) with perfect Q30 and Q20; duplication of 22.94% (scored 53/100) is the main limiting factor, indicating some PCR over-amplification. Otherwise strong quality suitable for variant discovery in mammals.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0