Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS (PacBio); grade D with provisional confidence (evidence_strength 0.61). Zero Q30 bases (measured) reflects PacBio's native quality-score model rather than a sequencing failure, but the scoring penalty suggests misalignment with Illumina-standard metrics; extrapolated coverage at 68.7× requires measured confirmation before reuse in assembly or consensus.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0