SRX105765

ENA first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

42/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Montevideo str. 4441 H

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 56756471 reported

total reads 207305 reported

n content pct 0.042 measured

pct q20 bases 69.9 measured

pct q30 bases 69.9 measured

gc content pct 50.8 measured

mean read length 123.5 measured

mean base quality 21.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 14.24 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 42/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 69.9 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 14.24 measured ×0.5 81%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0