Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-Seq of Drosophila miranda on the Illumina Genome Analyzer II yielded perfect base-quality scores (100% Q20 and Q30) across 25.6 million reads, establishing an uncommonly clean transcriptome profile for this model organism. The dataset's 5.2 Gb depth enables confident detection of both abundant and moderately-expressed transcripts. Comparative transcriptomics studies leveraging this clean short-read RNA-seq with other Drosophila species can rely on minimal sequencing artifacts.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0