SRX1092626

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

76/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Oryza sativa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 997175823 reported

total reads 20350527 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 88.6 measured

pct q30 bases 86.5 measured

gc content pct 45.5 measured

mean read length 49 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 85.3 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 76/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86.5 measured ×1 83%

mean base quality 33.9 measured ×0.6 98%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 85.3 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 32 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0