Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-seq of Oryza sativa from HiSeq 2500, 18M reads (49 bp). Grade B (84/100) with duplication of 73.98% (scored 2/100) is typical and expected for small-RNA libraries due to natural bias; measured Q30 of 97.2% and base quality of 38 are excellent. Duplication penalty is assay-inherent; otherwise high quality for miRNA quantification.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0