Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS of Homo sapiens using PacBio RS with 11.8 million reads generating 125 billion bases at estimated 40.3× coverage, capable of resolving structural variants, repetitive regions, and complex rearrangements that short reads miss. This dataset excels at discovering copy-number variations, duplications, and other complex genomic reorganizations critical for clinical and population-level human genome studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0