SRX109767

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

45/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Petromyzon marinus

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 22939079 reported

total reads 135835 reported

n content pct 0.35 measured

pct q20 bases 78 measured

pct q30 bases 78 measured

gc content pct 41.7 measured

mean read length 168.9 measured

mean base quality 24.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 43.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 45/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78 measured ×1 40%

mean base quality 24.1 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 43.65 measured ×0.4 70%

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0