Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This PacBio Sequel II long-read WGS of Homo sapiens provides ~25.5 Gb from ~1.6 million reads at minimal 8.2× coverage with high quality (98.9% Q20, 97.5% Q30), representing shallow long-read sequencing suitable only for targeted region analysis or structural-variant screening. The low coverage limits whole-genome applications. Researchers should use this for targeted rather than genome-wide studies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0