Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) bulk RNA-seq via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with flawless base quality (100% Q20 and Q30) from 11.3M reads. Despite modest read count, pristine quality enables confident transcript identification and expression profiling in this agricultural crop. Excellent-quality short-read RNA-seq suitable for tomato fruit development, disease-response transcriptomics, and quality-trait gene discovery.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0