Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Macaca mulatta WGS on Genome Analyzer IIx spans 61 Gb across 14 files with 407 million reads and 21.1× extrapolated coverage, though showing elevated N-content (1.583%) and moderate Q20 (85.6%), suggesting some sequencing or library complexity. The substantial depth compensates for modest quality, enabling variant discovery in this important nonhuman primate model. Primate genomics and comparative studies can use this macaque WGS for understanding genetic variation and population structure.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0