SRX1297474

ENA first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

86/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bacillus wiedmannii WGS on HiSeq 2500 yields ~261.3 million bases with excellent quality (99.7% Q20, 36.3% GC), enabling bacterial genomics. This pathogenic bacterium dataset suits clinical applications.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bacillus wiedmannii

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 261359218 reported

total reads 1302483 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 99.7 measured

pct q30 bases 98.3 measured

gc content pct 36.3 measured

mean read length 100.5 measured

mean base quality 37.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 24.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 86/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 24.45 measured ×0.5 49%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0