Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 WGS of Homo sapiens provides ~5.1 Gb from ~10 million reads at minimal 1.7× coverage with good quality (94.8% Q20, 91.7% Q30), representing exome-level coverage. The trivial depth is inadequate for genome-wide variant calling. Researchers should treat this as targeted sequencing rather than WGS.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0