← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
26/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Camellia sinensis var. sinensis
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
211367069
reported
total reads
437908
reported
n content pct
0.034
measured
pct q20 bases
61.3
measured
pct q30 bases
61.3
measured
gc content pct
45.5
measured
mean read length
385.7
measured
mean base quality
19.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
50.6
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 26/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
61.3
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
19.6
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
50.6
measured
×0.4
54%
QC cost
32 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0