SRX148740

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

30/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Gadus morhua 'NEAC'

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 90940097 reported

total reads 170592 reported

n content pct 0.047 measured

pct q20 bases 38.5 measured

pct q30 bases 38.5 measured

gc content pct 50.6 measured

mean read length 347 measured

mean base quality 13.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 39.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 30/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 38.5 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 13.4 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 39.65 measured ×0.4 79%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0