Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD 5500xl-W WGS of Homo sapiens provides ~353.7 Gb from ~4.7 billion reads at 114.1× coverage but with poor base quality (69.1% Q20, 45.3% Q30) characteristic of the discontinued SOLiD platform. The enormous volume and high coverage offset quality concerns for consensus calling but make SNP-calling challenging. Researchers working with legacy SOLiD data will find this relevant.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0