Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Homo sapiens using the AB 5500xl-W (SOLiD) platform with ultra-high coverage (103.8×) but color-space chemistry and lower Q-scores (65.6% Q20, 39.8% Q30) presents a technology-dependent tradeoff between depth and per-base confidence. This dataset excels at detecting common variants and copy-number changes where the extreme coverage compensates for individual-read quality, though variant calling requires SOLiD-aware pipelines.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0