Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS of Hordeum vulgare (barley) using PacBio RS II with 13.4 million reads covering 38.5 billion bases provides deep long-read coverage ideal for plant genome assembly and resolving complex polyploidy structures common in crop species. This dataset is particularly valuable for defining structural variants and repetitive regions in barley, enabling comprehensive plant genome construction and comparative crop genomics.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0