Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 WGS of Hordeum vulgare (barley) provides ~134.1 Gb from ~526 million reads at exceptional volume with very high quality (98.6% Q20, 94.7% Q30), enabling comprehensive plant-genome assembly and variant discovery for this important grain crop. The enormous dataset supports reference-genome and crop-breeding applications. Researchers seeking high-coverage plant genomics will find this highly valuable.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0