Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster WGS via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with very deep coverage (104.8×) from 70M reads, but moderate base quality (87.6% Q20, 81.4% Q30) may complicate variant calling. Excessive depth partially offsets quality limitations, enabling sensitive SNP discovery and large-scale population genomics in flies. High coverage compensates for quality, making this suitable for fly variant surveys despite read-quality constraints.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0