Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Drosophila melanogaster WGS on HiSeq 2000 delivers 7.5 Gb with 37 million reads at exceptional 53.3× extrapolated coverage and solid quality (95% Q20, 89.2% Q30), providing ultra-deep sequencing of this famous genetic model. The extraordinary depth enables sensitive detection of heterozygous variants and low-frequency structural rearrangements. Drosophila population genomics and mutagenesis studies can leverage this exceptionally deep resequencing dataset.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0