Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-coverage whole-genome sequencing of Drosophila melanogaster on Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 61× depth and strong base quality (95.4% Q20, 89.8% Q30) enables reliable detection of single-nucleotide variants and small indels across the genome. This dataset is well-powered for population genetics, structural variant screening, and comprehensive variant annotation in this established model organism.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0