Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster WGS via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with balanced coverage (64.5×) and good quality (95% Q20, 89.4% Q30) from 44.7M reads. Supports confident SNP/indel detection and sequence assembly for this model organism. Reliable short-read WGS dataset for standard Drosophila genetic studies and reference-genome improvement projects.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0