Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster WGS via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with moderate coverage (55.1×) from 30.8M reads and moderate base quality (90.7% Q20, 85.3% Q30). Enables SNP and indel discovery for fly genetics studies with acceptable fidelity over well-covered regions. Suitable for Drosophila population genomics and trait mapping, though coverage and quality are not exceptional compared to higher-depth alternatives.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0