Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq amplicon dataset from mouse-gut metagenome contains only ~435K reads (~131 Mb) with good quality (90.2% Q20, 80.3% Q30), providing shallow environmental amplicon profiling inadequate for comprehensive microbiome characterization. The minimal depth severely limits rare-taxon detection and community resolution. Researchers should treat this as preliminary microbiome survey data.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0