Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse gut metagenome amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 485.6K reads at moderate-to-good quality (90.2% Q20, 80.3% Q30) targeting microbial 16S rRNA or similar amplicons. Enables microbiota composition profiling and community-structure characterization in murine gastrointestinal ecology. Short-read amplicon-seq suitable for mouse microbiome studies, gut-health phenotyping, and microbial-trait association in rodent models.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0