Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
51/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-Seq of Caenorhabditis elegans on HiSeq 2000 spans 10.1 Gb with 174 million reads, though showing elevated N-content (0.961%) and moderate Q30 (82.5%) that may reflect polyA-tail sequencing or library artifacts. The massive depth enables confident detection of even lowly-expressed genes in this foundational nematode model. Whole-organism transcriptomics and temporal/developmental expression studies in C. elegans can leverage the scale of this dataset despite minor quality variation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0