Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS of Paulinella chromatophora on Illumina MiSeq delivers 21.1 Gb and 36 million reads with good quality (89.6% Q20, 87.4% Q30), providing useful coverage for this unusual protist harboring a photosynthetic organelle of independent origin. The dataset supports exploration of the chromatophore's distinct genome and gene expression, relevant to understanding eukaryotic endosymbiosis. Single-celled-organism genomics and organellar-evolution studies will find value in this WGS of this atypical photosynthetic eukaryote.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0