Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Bos taurus WGS on HiSeq 2500 covers 55.5 Gb with 222 million reads at ~20.6× extrapolated depth, delivering comprehensive livestock genome coverage with good base quality (95.5% Q20, 91.1% Q30). The dataset enables detection of both common polymorphisms and rare variants relevant to cattle genomic selection and breeding decisions. Agricultural genomics and population-level cattle-genome studies can draw on this high-depth, large-animal WGS for allele-frequency estimation and marker discovery.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0