Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This human WGS on HiSeq 2500 spans 82.7 Gb with 620 million reads at high 26.7× extrapolated coverage but elevated N-content (0.534%), providing sufficient depth for confident variant calling and structural-variant discovery despite minor quality reservations. The high coverage depth supports clinical-grade genotyping and de novo mutation detection. Human medical genomics and rare-disease studies can use this well-covered WGS for comprehensive variant annotation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0