Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 1500 WGS of Arabidopsis thaliana provides ~12.9 Gb from ~21 million reads at exceptional 95.8× coverage with moderate quality (85.2% Q20, 72.5% Q30), enabling ultra-deep plant-genome variant analysis and structural-variant calling. The extreme coverage of this model organism supports reference-genome and systems-genomics applications despite moderate quality. Researchers seeking high-coverage plant genomics will find this highly valuable.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0