Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with modest read count (9.7M reads) but flawless base quality (100% Q20 and Q30) from 467.6M bases. Small dataset but exceptional fidelity enables high-confidence transcript detection in well-expressed genes. Limited-scale short-read RNA-seq suited for targeted human transcriptomics, validation studies, and proof-of-concept expression analysis; not recommended for comprehensive human transcriptome profiling.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0