Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This human WGS on HiSeq 2500 covers 24.2 Gb with 48.8 million reads at ~7.8× extrapolated depth and good quality (96% Q20, 93.6% Q30), continuing the low-coverage human resequencing strategy across multiple samples. The dataset fits population-genomic designs requiring many individuals at shallow depth. Human population genetics and 1000 Genomes-scale studies can aggregate this and similar shallow-coverage samples.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0