Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx bulk RNA-seq of Prunus persica (peach) generates ~21 million reads (~3 Gb) with moderate quality (88.2% Q20, 60.6% Q30), enabling basic plant-transcriptome profiling from older-generation sequencing. The moderate quality requires careful transcript assembly and validation. Researchers seeking plant transcriptomics should accept quality limitations.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0