Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Ion Torrent PGM amplicon dataset from Mus musculus (mouse) contains ~416K reads (~219 Mb) with poor quality (45.9% Q20, 23.9% Q30) typical of Ion Torrent limitations. The shallow coverage and low quality restrict utility for robust variant genotyping. Researchers seeking mouse amplicon data should consider quality limitations.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0