Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oryza sativa Indica Group WGS via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 338.8M reads at good quality (96.5% Q20, 93.5% Q30) spanning 68.4B bases over the large rice genome. Deep coverage enables SNP discovery, structural-variant detection, and sequence-assembly refinement for this major food crop. High-depth short-read WGS ideal for rice breeding, crop-genetics mapping, and comparative genomics across Oryza subspecies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0