SRX181272

ENA first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

94/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Brassica rapa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

9 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1611837590 reported

total reads 9709865 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.4 measured

pct q30 bases 92.2 measured

gc content pct 41.6 measured

mean read length 83 measured

mean base quality 36.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 14.74 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 94/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 14.74 measured ×0.5 79%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 32 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0