Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 WGS of Plasmopara viticola (oomycete plant pathogen) provides ~4.5 Gb from ~22 million reads with good quality (96.9% Q20, 91.2% Q30), enabling pathogen-genome analysis for plant-disease research. The dataset supports plant-pathology and resistance-breeding studies. Researchers seeking fungal/oomycete genomics will find this useful.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0