Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This soil-metagenome amplicon on Illumina MiSeq spans 512 Mb with ~1 million reads but shows elevated N-content (2.636%) and low quality (52.4% Q20, 46.6% Q30), typical of complex environmental samples with contaminant DNA. Despite quality limitations, the dataset captures microbial community composition via targeted amplicon regions. Environmental microbiology and soil-ecology studies can use this soil metagenome amplicon-seq as a community-census snapshot, though taxonomic assignments should account for lower read fidelity.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0