Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 36.3M reads at good quality (96.9% Q20, 93.7% Q30) targeting region-specific amplicons at deep coverage. Enables ultra-deep targeted sequencing for variant calling, allele-frequency estimation, or amplicon-specific population genetics in humans. High-depth short-read amplicon-seq suited for exome-region deep-dives, locus-specific population surveys, and clinical-grade variant validation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0