Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This PacBio RS II FL-cDNA (full-length cDNA) dataset from Camellia sinensis (tea) contains only 737 reads (~1.1 Mb) with perfect quality scores (100% Q20/Q30), representing an extremely shallow long-read transcriptome sample. The trivial depth makes this unsuitable for comprehensive isoform discovery or expression analysis. Researchers should treat this as a pilot or validation dataset only.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0