Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Arabidopsis thaliana WGS via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with moderate coverage (36.8×) from 59.8M reads but compromised quality (60.1% Q20, 51.7% Q30). Genome-wide SNP discovery is feasible despite lower base quality; large read count partially compensates for quality limitations. Suitable for plant population genetics and trait-mapping studies where coverage depth offsets base-quality constraints; not ideal for fine-scale assembly or rare-variant calling.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0