Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Arabidopsis thaliana WGS via Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx with very deep coverage (101.7×) from 165.4M reads but lower base quality (63% Q20, 54.6% Q30). Extreme coverage partially offsets moderate quality, enabling SNP discovery across the plant genome despite read-level limitations. Suitable for large-scale plant population genomics and mapping studies where high coverage enables variant calling despite suboptimal base quality; not recommended for assembly.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0