Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx WGS of Homo sapiens provides only ~843 Mb from ~23 million reads at minimal 0.3× coverage with good quality (98.6% Q20, 90.5% Q30), representing exome or ultra-shallow WGS. The trivial depth severely limits whole-genome variant detection. Researchers should treat this as targeted sequencing rather than WGS.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0