SRX2511762

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This Illumina HiSeq 2000 WGS of Escherichia coli provides ~165 Mb from ~551K reads at 36× coverage with good quality (95.1% Q20, 93.9% Q30), enabling bacterial-genome variant analysis with reasonable depth. Researchers seeking bacterial genomics will find this useful.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Escherichia coli

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 165755116 reported

total reads 551590 reported

mean coverage 36 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.1 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 36.4 measured

adapter content pct 25.86 measured

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 36 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.38 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 25.86 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0