Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Zea mays bulk RNA-seq via Illumina Genome Analyzer yielding 19.2M reads at excellent quality (99.2% Q20, 98.3% Q30); enables transcriptome mapping and gene expression quantification across maize tissues. Depth is limited (960M total bases) for deep expression profiling, but sufficient for discovering expressed loci. Suitable for maize developmental transcriptomics and functional annotation of coding sequences.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0