Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WES (whole-exome sequencing) of Homo sapiens on Ion Torrent PGM spans 4.04 Gb with 26 million reads but shows lower quality (84.8% Q20, 55.5% Q30) characteristic of this semiconductor platform, targeting coding regions for medical-genetics studies. The targeted approach concentrates depth on disease-relevant exons despite platform-specific quality. Clinical genetics and rare-disease studies can use this exome WES for gene-discovery variants.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0